Cloning - Well, Split My Embryo! :: Cloning Argumentative Persuasive Argument

Cloning Well, Split My Embryo Genetic engineering, altering the inherited characteristics of an organism in apredetermined way, by introducing into it a piece of the genic vapiderial ofanother organism.  Genetic engineering offers the consent of cures for manyinherited diseases, once the problem of low efficiencies of effective transferof transmissibleal material is overcome.  some other development has been the refinement of the technique called cloning,which produces large numbers of genetically identical individuals bytransplanting whole cell nuclei.  With other techniques scientists can isolatesections of deoxyribonucleic acid representing single genes, determine their nucleotide sequences,and reproduce them in the laboratory.  This offers the possibility of creatingentirely new genes with commercially or medically desirable properties. While the potential benefits of genetic engineering are considerable, so may bethe potential dangers.  For ex ample, the introduction of cancer-causing genesinto a common infectious organism, such as the influenza virus, could behazardous. We present come to believe that all human beings are equal but even more firmly,we are taught to believe each one of us is unique.  Is that topic undercut bycloning? That is, if you can deliberately make any number of copies of anindividual, is each one special?  How special can clones feel, knowing they werereplicated analogous smile buttons.  We arent just our genes, were a wholecollection of our experiences, says Albert Jonsen.  But the idea, he adds,raises a host of issues, from the fantastic to the profound. When anesthesia was discovered in the 19th century, there was a speculation thatit would rob humans of the transforming experience of suffering.  When threedecades ago, James Watson and Francis Crick unraveled the genetic code, populardiscussion turned not to the new hope for vanquishing disease but to the spectero f genetically engineered races of supermen and worker drones.  Later, thearrival of organ transplants set people brooding about a world of clankingFrankensteins, welded together made from used parts. Already there are thousands of frozen embryos sitting in liquid nitrogen storagearound the country.  Suppose somebody valued to advertise cloned embryos byshowing pictures of already born children like a product, says Prof. RuthMacklin, of New Yorks Albert Einstein College of medicine, who specializes inhuman reproduction. Splitting an embryo mat seem a great technological leap, but in a world whereembryos are already created in test tubes, its a baby step.  The contemporarychallenge in reproductive medicine is not to produce more embryos but toidentify healthy ones and get them to grow in the womb.  Using genetic tests,doctors can now screen embryonic cells for hereditary diseases.

Emancipation :: essays research papers

Emancipation has been defined as the pursuit, expansion, and security of freedom. I believe that most people including myself would say successful freedom has taken place when freedom has been pursued, expanded upon, and secured. What makes peoples views of emancipation different is not its definition, but what is freedom? Freedom shows a lot of faces throughout the times and environments examine in both the Haitian and Jamaican Revolutions. Freedom for myself is a peace of perspicacity. I feel that a person who wakes up with a peace of mind has experienced successful emancipation. Successful emancipation does not mean that everything is perfect and the way it should be. Perfection does not exist in this world everything has its flaws and downfalls including emancipation, justice, and freedom. I think back we all work towards the day we arrive at established who we are and find comfort with our role in society. I also feel it is hard for us to be as thoughtful and passionate a bout emancipation as the slaves of these times were. Our minds cant conceive the true feeling of what is like to be treated like something other than a human being. I feel our lifestyles are far beyond a slaves view of what emancipation is.Slaves in both Haiti and Jamaica did not rebel in order to live a lifestyle we live today. They were willing to settle for far less than we have today. Slaves were willing to die in order to experience what they felt was successful emancipation. Successful emancipation for slaves was not be confounded to land or own by whites. Slaves simply wanted the opportunity to work their own land, dough families, and enjoy life. Although most people in Haiti and Jamaica of African descent were slaves, there was a small minority of free people, which consisted of mulattos and free blacks. Even though these free people witnessed first hand the experienced of slavery the compassion and empathy for it was definitely disappointing. Their spirit of emancipation was totally different than that of slaves. The free people already experienced and had what slaves desired and viewed as emancipation. Free people had their own land to farm, build houses on, and start families. Thus giving them a totally different perspective on emancipation and freedom. Despite free people had their own land, they still were not obturate to sharing the same rights as the whites.

How George Psalmanazar Escaped From History :: History Historical Essays

How George Psalmanazar Escaped From History Moravagine is an idiot, but he is also an idiom...a consideration whose meaning is established by usage, and not deducible from the meanings of its constituent parts. Idioms are the place where language shows signs of wear those phrases have been said so many quantify they have fused into a single unit and can no longer be pried apart.-- Paul La Farge, Idiots, The Believer1.In early 1703, a man named George Psalmanazar arrived in London and had a few discreet conversations. Within a year, he had a publishing contract and the ear of the British princely courts not long after that he was presumptuousness a post at Oxford. Psalmanazars book, An Historical and Geographic Description of Formosa, describing the virtually enigmatical East Asiatic island society from whence he came, was read throughout Europe, and his beliefs - among them, that false accusations were worse than cannibalism, Jesuits were the ruin of pure societies, and t he blood of snakes could keep a man alive for a century - were repeated as ethnographic dogma. In keeping with the traditions of his native land, Psalmanazar ate only raw foods and recorded the Lords Prayer in an alphabet unknown to Western civilization (Aldington 44). His conversion from pagan heathenism to the Anglican Church fueled a thousand heated theological debates in learned society. one time ingratiated into European literary circles, he used his unique firsthand knowledge of Formosa to help compile one of the greatest encyclopedias British society had to that point seen (Stagl 186). When at last Psalmanazar passed away in 1763, leaving behind a small estate, a room of empty laudanum bottles, and a request to be bury in a paupers grave, it seemed that the idiom would never be pried open. The man from another world was modestly interred and there the matter appeared to rest.In 1764 his papers were given a more thorough examination, and the following facts were discovered - The deceased mans name was not George Psalmanazar. - In almost no way did the actual island of Formosa resemble Psalmanazars celebrated account of it. - Psalmanazar had, in fact, been born in Europe, and never left it in his lifetime. - The society, language, history, belief system, and culture of Formosa, right down to the calendar, were products of his own invention.The strange case of George Psalmanazar lies someplace at the uncomfortable intersection of truth and credulity.